- Home
- Case Study Solution
Harley-Davidson: Rejuvenating an Iconic Brand Custom Case Solution & Analysis
1. Evidence Brief: Harley-Davidson Data Extraction
Financial Metrics
- Revenue Trend: US retail sales declined for 14 consecutive quarters leading into 2019. Global shipments fell from 262,221 units in 2016 to 228,051 in 2018.
- Profitability: Operating margin for the motorcycles segment dropped from 17.5 percent in 2016 to 12.6 percent in 2018.
- R&D Investment: Increased spending to approximately 190 million dollars in 2018 to support the More Roads to Harley-Davidson initiative.
- Tariff Impact: EU retaliatory tariffs increased from 6 percent to 31 percent, adding an estimated 2,200 dollars per bike exported from the US to Europe.
Operational Facts
- Product Mix: Historically 70 percent of sales derived from heavyweight cruisers (601cc+).
- Manufacturing: Opened a plant in Rayong, Thailand in 2018 to bypass ASEAN and EU tariffs. US manufacturing concentrated in York, Pennsylvania and Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin.
- Distribution: Network of approximately 1,400 independent dealerships globally. US dealers are aging, mirroring the customer base.
- New Product Launch: LiveWire (EV) launched in 2019 with a retail price of 29,799 dollars.
Stakeholder Positions
- Matt Levatich (CEO): Proponent of the More Roads strategy; emphasizes building the next generation of riders globally.
- Traditionalist Customers (H.O.G. Members): Value the 45-degree V-twin engine sound and chrome aesthetic; often skeptical of electric or small-displacement models.
- Investors: Concerned with the 20 percent share price decline in 2018 and the high cost of the strategic pivot.
- Dealers: Resistant to investing in EV charging infrastructure and new showroom layouts required for non-traditional models.
Information Gaps
- Unit-level margins for the 250cc-500cc models planned for Asia.
- Customer acquisition cost for Millennials compared to Baby Boomers.
- Cannibalization rate of used Harley-Davidson bikes on new entry-level sales.
2. Strategic Analysis
Core Strategic Question
- Can Harley-Davidson successfully decouple its brand from the Baby Boomer aesthetic to capture younger, urban, and international riders without bankrupting the company or alienating its core profit-generating base?
Structural Analysis
The heavyweight motorcycle market is in structural decline in the US due to demographic shifts. Harley-Davidson holds over 50 percent market share in a shrinking segment. Using the Ansoff Matrix, the company is attempting simultaneous Product Development (EV and small-displacement bikes) and Market Development (Asia and urban centers). The primary barrier is the Brand Image: the association with loud, heavy, chrome-heavy machines is a deterrent to the target 18-34 demographic who prioritize utility, sustainability, and ease of use.
Strategic Options
| Option | Rationale | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| Aggressive EV Transition | Positions H-D as a tech leader; bypasses the baggage of internal combustion. | High R&D costs; LiveWire price point is too high for the target demographic. |
| International Small-Displacement Focus | Captures growth in India and SE Asia where 250cc-500cc is the volume segment. | Lower margins per unit; risks diluting the premium brand status. |
| Niche Premium Defender | Shrink the company to match the declining but loyal cruiser market; maximize cash flow. | Terminal decline; company becomes a boutique manufacturer with limited scale. |
Preliminary Recommendation
Harley-Davidson must execute a dual-track strategy. It should use the cash flow from the heavyweight segment to fund the transition to mid-weight (Pan America) and small-displacement international models. The EV line must be expanded downward in price immediately. The brand must shift from selling a rebel lifestyle to selling premium mobility. This requires moving production for international markets entirely offshore to maintain price competitiveness.
3. Implementation Roadmap
Critical Path
- Phase 1 (0-6 Months): Negotiate dealer compensation structures to incentivize sales of lower-margin small bikes and EVs. Install universal EV charging stations across 100 percent of the US dealer network.
- Phase 2 (6-18 Months): Launch the 338cc model in China and India through the Qianjiang partnership. Execute the Pan America (Adventure Touring) global launch to challenge BMW and KTM.
- Phase 3 (18-36 Months): Introduce a mid-priced EV motorcycle (12,000-15,000 dollars) to bridge the gap between e-bicycles and the LiveWire.
Key Constraints
- Dealer Culture: Many US dealers are specialized in high-margin chrome accessories and heavyweight service; they lack the capability to sell to urban commuters.
- Capital Allocation: Maintaining dividends while funding a 200 million dollar annual R&D budget is unsustainable if US sales continue to drop by more than 5 percent annually.
- Supply Chain Friction: Shifting production to Thailand requires a complete re-qualification of tier-2 and tier-3 suppliers to maintain H-D quality standards.
Risk-Adjusted Implementation Strategy
To mitigate execution risk, H-D should spin off the EV division into a sub-brand (LiveWire) to protect the core brand from failure and allow the EV unit to adopt a tech-company culture. If the 338cc Asian launch fails to meet 15 percent margin targets within 24 months, the company must pivot to a pure licensing model in those regions to protect the balance sheet.
4. Executive Review and BLUF
BLUF
Harley-Davidson must pivot from a legacy culture brand to a global mobility company. The core US demographic is aging out, and the current heavyweight product mix is a liability. The More Roads strategy is the correct path, but execution is hampered by a high-priced EV entry and a resistant dealer network. Success requires spinning off the EV business to attract tech-focused capital and aggressively scaling mid-weight and small-displacement bikes in Asia. The company must prioritize rider acquisition over per-unit margin in the short term to ensure long-term viability. Speed is the primary requirement; the 14-quarter sales decline indicates the window for transformation is closing.
Dangerous Assumption
The analysis assumes that the Harley-Davidson brand name carries positive equity with Millennials and Gen Z. There is a significant risk that the brand is not just old-fashioned, but actively unappealing to younger buyers who associate it with a specific political and social identity. If the brand name is the barrier, no amount of product innovation will fix the sales decline.
Unaddressed Risks
- Used Market Saturation: A massive influx of used heavyweight Harleys from aging riders will depress new bike prices and compete directly with H-D’s own entry-level products.
- Regulatory Shift: Increasing urban restrictions on internal combustion engines in Europe and Asia may render the mid-weight strategy obsolete before it reaches scale.
Unconsidered Alternative
The team should consider a pure Brand Licensing model for apparel and lifestyle goods, while drastically downsizing manufacturing to a high-margin, low-volume custom shop. This would convert H-D into a high-margin intellectual property company, removing the capital intensity and operational risk of global manufacturing and EV development.
Verdict
APPROVED FOR LEADERSHIP REVIEW
AFS: Flagging the Next Product Line custom case study solution
De Beers: Reverse-disrupting the Diamond Industry custom case study solution
The Reinvention of Kodak custom case study solution
Airbnb: Home Sharing in China custom case study solution
Spotify's Direct-Listing IPO custom case study solution
Whole Foods under Amazon custom case study solution
Google Play Store in India: Playing with Networks custom case study solution
Overlook the Infraction or Stick to the Rules? custom case study solution
Ashok Kumar Pandey custom case study solution
Rent-a-Center/Vintage Capital custom case study solution
Globalizing Consumer Durables: Singer Sewing Machine Before 1914 custom case study solution