- Home
- Case Study Solution
Savage Beast (A1) Custom Case Solution & Analysis
Evidence Brief: Savage Beast (A1)
Financial Metrics
Data extracted from case exhibits and narrative:
- Total Deferred Compensation: 1.5 million dollars owed to 50 employees as of 2004.
- Initial Funding: 2 million dollars raised in 2000.
- Burn Rate: Significant during the 2000 to 2004 period with zero ability to pay salaries for over two years.
- Revenue Sources: Small licensing deals with AOL and Best Buy, insufficient to cover operational costs.
- Equity Distribution: Founders and early employees hold significant stakes, but value is currently theoretical due to insolvency.
Operational Facts
- Core Asset: The Music Genome Project, a database of musical metadata.
- Analysis Process: Each song requires 20 to 30 minutes of manual analysis by a trained musician.
- Attribute Count: 400 distinct musical characteristics tracked per song.
- Headcount: 50 employees who remained with the company despite receiving no pay for extended periods.
- Technology: Proprietary matching algorithm designed to recommend music based on objective musical traits rather than social filtering.
Stakeholder Positions
- Tim Westergren: Founder and primary evangelist. Committed to the vision of the Music Genome Project. Focused on survival and keeping the team together.
- Will Glaser: Technical architect. Responsible for the scalability of the recommendation engine.
- The Fifty: Employees who worked without pay. Their loyalty is the primary reason the company still exists, yet they represent the largest financial liability.
- Venture Capitalists: Generally skeptical of the B2B licensing model for music recommendation during the post-dot-com collapse.
Information Gaps
- Detailed breakdown of the 1.5 million dollar debt by seniority or role.
- Specific terms of existing licensing agreements with AOL or Best Buy.
- Exact cost per song for analysis when accounting for overhead and training.
- Current cash on hand, if any, at the moment of the 2004 pivot decision.
Strategic Analysis
Core Strategic Question
- Can Savage Beast successfully transition from a back-end software provider for retailers to a consumer-facing media platform before the deferred salary debt triggers a total collapse?
Structural Analysis
The Music Genome Project provides a unique competitive advantage in the recommendation space. Unlike collaborative filtering used by Amazon or early Napster, which relies on user behavior, Savage Beast relies on the inherent properties of the music itself. This solves the cold start problem for new or obscure artists.
However, the B2B licensing model is broken. Retailers like Best Buy view music discovery as a feature, not a core product, leading to low pricing power and long sales cycles. The value chain analysis suggests that Savage Beast is currently a low-tier vendor in a shrinking retail market. To capture more value, the company must move closer to the end consumer.
Strategic Options
| Option | Rationale | Trade-offs |
|---|---|---|
| B2C Streaming Pivot (Pandora) | Directly utilizes the Music Genome Project to solve user discovery pain points. High scalability. | Requires massive capital for licensing and marketing. High regulatory risk. |
| IP Liquidation/Sale | Settles the 1.5 million dollar debt immediately and provides an exit for the 50 employees. | Eliminates all future upside. Likely results in a fire-sale price given the distressed state. |
| Niche Professional Licensing | Focus on high-end film and advertisement music placement services. | Limited market size. Does not solve the need for rapid, large-scale growth. |